Simplified procedure for foundation of standard LLCs

26/07/2018 14:37

The Austrian Parliament recently passed an amendment to the law on limited liability companies (LLCs) aimed at simplifying the foundation of a special kind of LLC. The purpose of the changes – and the simplifications associated with them ­– have been hotly debated.

Kết quả hình ảnh cho LLCs


The new law seeks to make LLCs more attractive – especially for start-ups – by speeding up the foundation process and reducing associated costs. In order to benefit from the simplified procedure, the company must be a one-person LLC (ie, the sole founder and shareholder is a natural person who is also the sole managing director), with a standardised declaration of establishment, which is predefined by decree (standard LLC).

When founding a standard LLC the sole founder must first approach a bank, open a new account and pay the capital contribution. Then the bank will issue a confirmation that the share capital has been paid, identify the founder by requesting an official identification document and a specimen signature (simple form, no certification required). The bank then electronically submits the identification data and the confirmation to the competent commercial court (eg, the Vienna Commercial Court for LLCs with their corporate seat in Vienna). Subsequently, in order to guarantee double identification, the founder identifies him or herself to the court through a citizen's card or mobile phone signature. The founder may submit the (standardised) declaration of establishment as well as the application for registration of the company with the commercial register in one step.

A core feature of the new law is that a standard LLC can be founded without a notary. In contrast with the existing law, the declaration of establishment does not have to be an Austrian notarial deed and the specimen signature of the sole founder as the managing director and the application for registration in the commercial register do not have to be certified by a notary.

The amendments to the law will come into force on January 1 2018. The new provision (Section 9a of the Limited Liability Company Act) may cease to be in force after a three-year period (ie, after December 31 2020).


According to legislative materials, 38% of all newly founded LLCs meet the requirements to be considered as a standard LLC. However, the proposed amendments do not particularly benefit start-ups as such companies rarely have just one founder. Moreover, if a standard LLC wishes to bring on investors as shareholders at a later date, a notary (and its related costs) is likely to be needed. A notary must also be consulted whenever the declaration of establishment is amended.

While founding an LLC without a notary in an accelerated and less expensive procedure may appear attractive at first glance, there are several problems worth exploring. In the regular foundation of an LLC, a notary ensures the protection of:

  • the founder – through his or her legal advice and instruction duties; and
  • the general public – by verifying the founder's legal capacity and issuing officially attested deeds, which provide legal certainty.

Another typical problem that may occur without professional consultation arises when choosing a company name that does not comply with the law. Banks, which will be the first and main point of contact throughout the foundation process, cannot fully make up for these shortcomings and legal risks.

It is also doubtful if it is worth encountering the above issues for the sake of saving a few days. The idea and process of founding a company does not typically develop overnight, but is carefully planned over an extended period. Also, the cost savings of this foundation procedure cannot yet be determined as the services provided by notaries are more or less passed on to banks, and according to the legislative materials, banks may collect an as yet undetermined fee for their services.

Therefore, it remains to be seen whether the proposed procedure for the founding of a standard LLC will be useful in practice.

For further information on this topic please contact Fabian Kacic or Christopher Jünger at Schoenherr Attorneys at Law by telephone (+43 1 5343 70) or email ( The Schoenherr Attorneys at Law website can be accessed


Credits: International Law Office


Share Post
  • VIAC welcomed representative delegation of The Chinese Arbitration Association (CAA) 06/05/2019 10:23

    On 31 March – 4 April 2019, CAA delegation led by Honorary Chairman, Mr. Nigel N.T. Li, with members including Mr. James C.C. Ku (President of CAA Mediation Centre / CAA Standing Director), Mr. Chia-Ching Lee (CAA Standing Director), Ms. Helena Hsi-Chia Chen (Vice President of CAA Mediation Centre), and Ms. Winnie Jo-Mei Ma (Deputy Secretary-General) visited Vietnam. This visit aimed at strengthening CAA’s cooperation framework with arbitral institutions in Vietnam, as well as to assisting Taiwanese enterprises based in Vietnam with alternative dispute resolution such as arbitration and mediation.


  • Message from the Secretary General 2019 13/02/2019 10:57

    It somehow is always one of the most special time of the year to me, at a very late afternoon in year-end days, I was sitting at my desk and flipping through the 2018 Report of Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (VIAC) 

  • Trade disputes on the rise in Vietnam 25/01/2019 10:28

    The Vietnam International Arbitration Center (VIAC), one of the 22 arbitration centers mediating disputes outside the courts, received 180 cases last year, with a combined dispute value of VND9.4 trillion, the highest in its 25-year history and higher than the previous year’s figure.

  • Cooperative agreement signing ceremony between VIAC and PCA 27/12/2018 10:27

    On the afternoon of December 17th 2018, Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (VIAC) has signed the Cooperative Agreement with the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA).

  • Transshipment risks for steel makers 16/11/2018 15:00

    The escalating trade dispute between the US and China is causing headaches for Vietnam when dealing with the re-routing of goods, and could lead to it becoming a “transshipment hub” for overseas products.

  • Hong Kong court refuses to enforce an arbitral award on the basis of violation of public policy 02/11/2018 09:30

    The Hong Kong Court of First Instance (“CFI”) refused to recognize and enforce an arbitral award (“Award”) of the China Guangzhou Arbitration Commission (“Commission”) on the basis that enforcement under section 95(3)(b) of the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance would be contrary to the public policy of Hong Kong

  • Signing of co-operation agreement with CIArb and ICDR/AAA 15/10/2018 11:21

    On October 12th 2018, Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (VIAC) has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, London Branch and a Cooperation Agreement (CA) with the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), a division of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) as part of the opening ceremony for the Introduction to International Arbitration Course, hosted by VIAC and CIArb, London and sponsored by ICDR at Deutsche Haus Building, Ho Chi Minh City.

  • Mitigating investment risk – treaty planning and damages claims against state entities 27/08/2018 10:27

    What do these three scenarios have in common? An investor is negotiating a contract with a state entity in a high-risk jurisdiction. An investor – an individual or a corporate entity – is considering how to structure its holdings in a tax efficient manner. An investor is facing potential asset nationalisation or breach by a state entity of its contractual obligations.