View of arbitrators

US-China trade war evolves into battle for power

10/08/2018 11:18

The US-China relationship is not a story of only two countries; it also involves other countries and international institutions such the as World Trade Organisation. — Photo

By Võ Trí Thành*

Last week, international media reported that the Trump administration was considering slapping a 25 per cent tariff on US$200 billion of imported Chinese goods, 10 per cent higher than its initial proposal, in a bid to pressure Beijing to make trade concessions.

In response, China said it would impose more taxes on $60 billion in US goods.

The escalating trade conflict between the two world biggest economies shows no signs of abating with new moves from the Trump administration, followed by China’s announcement of retaliation.

The US-China trade war started in March when US President Donald Trump threatened to impose a 25 per cent tariff on $50 billion worth of Chinese imports. All attempts at avoiding the tariff war fell apart and the tariff hike took effect in early July.

This could develop into a stubborn battle with many scenarios, which would have immediate and longer-term impacts on many countries, including Việt Nam, and may lead to different policy responses.

Competition between major powers that leads to changes in the world order is not a new issue. It springs from the calculation of countries on their national interests in political-economic leverage, as well as their dominant role in the world.

This issue was broadly discussed during the Cold War when the United States and Soviet Union fought for global supremacy. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, the world transitioned to a unipolar system with the United States as its centre. Now, the international system seems to be in favours of multipolarity with the rising roles of emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRICs), along with the relative decline of the dominant roles played by the US and EU.

In this process, the growth of China has had major impact on the world.

After outstriping Japan to become the world’s second-largest economy in 2010, China has advanced strongly and expanded its influence externally through ambitious and interlacing trade and investment around the world.

There are three prevailing opinions on how China is rising. Firstly, China is a very big and attractive market with over 1.4 billion people along with a fast-growing middle-income class. It has been the biggest market of most multinational corporations as well as being an important trade partner of many counntries.

Secondly, China should play a larger role matching its development and influence. Together with emergence of other economies, the G20 has given developing countries a bigger role in shaping the global architecture. Developing nations also play a crucial role in international organisations.

In 2015, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved China’s renminbi as one of the world’s main currencies. This was a milestone that underscored the country’s rising financial and economic heft.

However, there are also concerns that China’s expansion will affect the dominant roles of large countries, as well as China’s behaviour with other nations, especially in territorial disputes.

In this context, the US strategy toward China has reflected these views. Though US policy has changed over time, many policy analysts have agreed that the United States has always wanted to restrain China’s ambitions.

Under the Obama administration, the Unites States turned towards Asia-Pacific. The “pivot” to Asia policy was portrayed as confronting China to take the leadership in the region. One important part was Obama’s push trade in Asia through the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). However, this agreement was abandoned under Trump administration.

In the time of President Trump, the US policy has become more direct. The US wants China to play fair on trade, seeking to reduce a widening trade deficit with China. It has requested China to enforce the protection of intellectual property rights and stop manipulating its currency.

This strategy nevertheless raises doubts. Has the US achieved the desired results from pursuing a trade war with China as both theory and reality show that trade wars do not bring positive results for any party? Is this a wise way to contain China’s ambitions, especially in its technology development?

The US can achieve the goal of cutting its trade deficit with China, but it may also self destruct its role as a leader and advocator of development co-operation policy. In the long term, confidence and trust of countries in a reliable super power will also be negatively affected.

For China, this is also a big test. China is a large emerging economy and it wants to enhance its role as a super power. However, its behaviour has failed to build belief and the confidence among the global community.

As a rulemaker, China’s One Belt One Road initiative is vast and promises to expand its soft power in Asia, Europe and Africa by creating much-needed infrastructure. The idea of boosting connectivity given the weakening effect of tariff reductions should be hailed, but this idea still draws criticism when it is linked with political and sovereignty issues.

This demonstrates that confidence remains a big issue for this country which requires policy and behaviour adjustments to ensure stability, sovereignty and economic development in the country and the region.

Implications for Việt Nam

The US-China relationship is not the story of only two countries but also involves other countries and international institutions such as the World Trade Organisation (WTO).

Việt Nam is a small but highly open economy (total import/export turnover equal to nearly 200 per cent of GDP). The country is vulnerable to external shocks. The US-China trade war and other trade conflicts, if they escalate, will affect Việt Nam’s economy.

Việt Nam needs to pay attention to the following issues in order to ensure its sovereignty and a stable environment for sustainable development.

Việt Nam has pursued mulilateral diplomacy while maintaining good relationships as well as signing free trade agreements (FTAs) with important partners. Participating in bilateral and multilateral mechanisms is a good platform for the country to diversify markets, reduce dependence on one or two markets and attract more high-quality foreign direct investment (FDI). This is a good policy that we should continue to promote.

In the context of global uncertainties, Việt Nam has to do more to ensure macroeconomic stability and increase the resilience of the whole economy. Its macro policies need to be flexible enough to absorb external shocks, especially focusing on strengthening the banking system.

The risk management capacity of the Government and enterprises should also be enhanced together with institutional reforms in order to develop inner strength and increase competitiveness and efficiency.

It needs to keep a close watch on the global situation to be well-prepared for different scenarios.

At present, trade wars are not having a large impact on the domestic economy, but in the long run, if they continue, the risk of instability will negatively affect investment, monetary policy, exports, capital flows, trade and growth in the country.

* Võ Trí Thành is a senior economist at the Central Institute for Economic Management (CIEM), a member of the National Financial and Monetary Policy Advisory Council and a listed arbitrator of Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (VIAC). The holder of a doctorate in economics from the Australian National University, Thành mainly undertakes research and provides consultation on issues related to macroeconomic policies, trade liberalisation and international economic integration. Other areas of interest include institutional reforms and financial systems.

Read more at:

Share Post
  • Local businesses advised to capitalize on FTAs 12/11/2018 11:17

    Despite its involvement in in numerous Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and new-generation FTAs, Vietnam has yet to take full advantage of incentivesand opportunities it receives from its participation in FTAs.

  • Farm produce needs improved quality to unlock EU market 23/08/2018 11:46

    Vietnam is one of the important suppliers of farm produce to the EU, ranking 12th among all exporting nations and meeting 2.2% of the demand, above Thailand, New Zealand, Malaysia and Canada. However, the EU has paid due attention to food value, quality, safety and hygiene and has issued stringent regulations on antibiotics, pesticides and tracing product origin.

  • Concerns about Multiple Sublicenses from National Competition Committee Model 17/05/2018 13:46

    The National Competition Committee should be an independent governmental body rather than a ministerial affiliate, said at a Consultative Workshop on Revised Law on Competition, raising concerns about the birth of multiple sublicenses, monopolistic behaviours and power abuse in the public service. 

  • Forgiving tax debts must be done transparently 06/04/2018 14:08

    Tax losses caused by enterprises that have received contracts to be paid from the State budget, but haven’t yet paid their taxes, are also under consideration for tax clearance. The amount of tax arrears is estimated at over VNĐ542 billion (roughly $24 million).

  • Tough odds for VN market upgrade 19/03/2018 09:43

    Việt Nam’s securities market has a 25 per cent chance of being upgraded to the “emerging market” status from its current “frontier market” level by 2021, according to Võ Trí Thành, senior economist at the Central Institute for Economic Management (CIEM) cum VIAC arbitrator.

  • Mine declines: Good news for sustainability 07/03/2018 10:54

    Statistics from the General Statistics Office of Việt Nam (GSO) showed that the mining industry has posted a record slump since 2011, with the growth rate dropping by 7.1 per cent in 2017 and 4 per cent in 2016. This could be a small disappointment amid lots of bright spots in the country’s wider socio-economic picture last year. But this could also lead to an alarming conclusion – the mining industry will be unable to return to growth, and so the growth pattern must be transformed. 

  • Insurance books should not be used as collateral 06/03/2018 17:09

    Lawmakers, lawyers and leaders from Vietnam Social Security (VSS), a State agency in charge of the country’s social insurance programme, have all advised against the practice of using social insurance books as collateral by banks, credit institutions and small loan businesses at a conference last week on the subject.  

  • Five Vietnamese think tanks have been ranked in the top 100 06/03/2018 17:07

    The five think tanks are Việt Nam’s Institute of World Economics and Politics (30th), the Diplomatic Academy of Việt Nam (40th), the Việt Nam Institute of Economics (42nd), the Việt Nam Institute for Economic and Policy Research (VEPR - 56th), and the Việt Nam’s Institute for American Studies (97th).